Napisz odpowiedź

Message

[QUOTE="iStig, post: 122496, member: 2788"]
w dużym skrócie - serwis EV jest tańszy, ale obsługa szkód powoduje spore koszty.

Wypowiedź prezesa podczas omawiania wyników za Q3

"...Let me share a bit more context on the damage equation. First, while conventional maintenance on electric vehicles remained lower relative to comparable ICE vehicles in Q3, higher collision and damage repairs on EVs continue to weigh on our results and negatively impacted EBITDA. For context, collision and damage repairs on an EV can often run about twice that associated with a comparable combustion engine vehicle..."

"...Let me try to put some dimension to the issue. Taking account of the impact on depreciation, collision and damage and RPU relating to our EV fleet, we estimate that had our fleet in Q3 been similarly sized but comprised solely of ICE vehicles our EBITDA margin would have been several margin points higher... "

link do transcriptu
[URL unfurl="true"]https://ir.hertz.com/static-files/75a583c0-90e0-496a-8b45-9f9d9389a93a[/URL]
[/QUOTE]

Verification